So in my perusal of newsworthy items, one of the newest discussions has been of Eric Holder, and President-Elect Obama’s desire to have him serve as the U.S. Attorney General during his administration.  The historic nature of this cannot be ignored.  While no formal offer has been made and Holder has not been vetted and his background check finished, we can say that the wheels are in motion to have the 1st African-American Attorney General this nation has ever seen. 

There was a time when the Attorney General in this country was put in difficult 
positions regarding race and protecting the rights of Blacks within the context of Federal Law.  The idea that a Black man is highly qualified and highly considered for this position almost 50 years later is a testament again to a cultural progression in this country.
I would be very happy if he was selected, not simply because of his skin color – but because of his high level of qualification, and also because of his central appeal.  In an area that is supposed to be as objective and factual as the legal field, having an AG that is middle of the road keeps interpretation of the government’s legal authority from being too expansive or too constrictive.  Also, he demonstrates a neutrality of party politics in his history as a legal appointee.  He has served under Republican appointee with President Reagan, and also under the Attorney General in the Clinton Administration.  
I do worry about the perception of Obama’s picks to fulfill these positions up to this point.  So far, John Podesta heads his transition team.  Rahm Emanuel will serve as his chief od staff.  Pending approval, formal offer and formal accepatance, Holder will serve as his next announcement of a major level advisor role filled.  Other talk in the news recently has been about the likelihood of Senator Clinton being appointed Secretary of State.  What do these names all have in common aside from their connection to Obama?
Bill Clinton.
Podesta served as Clinton’s chief of staff.  Emanuel was a senior advisor during the Clinton Administration.  Holder served under the AG in the Clinton Administration.  Hillary Clinton is the wife of Bill.  It seems that these first few picks and some of the considerations that Obama has in mind come from an era of Democratic politics that saw great gains, but was also in the 20th Century.
My only concern about the perception is that Obama’s appeal was the belief that change was going to be widespread – from the current state of the economy and energy use to a new state; from old politics in Washington to new.  I can see skeptics and cynics looking at these appointee considerations as a form of the old politics that a political power circle like the Clintons may represent.  
Obama has demonstrated good judgment however, and I do not doubt that these moves will set up the Obama administration to take over January 20th, 2009.
Sphere: Related Content

Popularity: unranked [?]

photo by Jackie (CC)

As we reach the 2 day marker before election, we see both candidates selling their final message to the public. The candidates understand the fact that generally, 1 in 10 Americans make up their minds in the 5 days before an election. However news reports came out today, identifying a last minute push by Pennsylvanian Republicans to remind the voters of that state that Barack Obama is associated with the “hateful” speech of Jeremiah Wright, which is a testament to his judgment.

Really though? We are back to Jeremiah Wright? Should that even be an issue with the state of the economy and the other dire issues on the table? Is this an act of desperation by the Republican party?

Well, first I must say I am proud of John McCain for not endorsing this tactic and repeatedly saying that Obama’s relationship with Wright should not be an issue. Thank you for at least providing some leadership on that. Good thing Palin is not heading the ticket, because I believe she would not hesitate to run this one in to the ground.

Let’s look at the content of this ad: it is truly silly. First off, what ever happened to separation of church and state? But, let us not debate the message of Rev. Wright’s words. Let us look at the ad’s argument. If Obama had really walked away from his church and pastor of 20 years, it would be a different set of ads running by the Republican party, but definitely not in praise of him. Instead they would have talked about him abandoning his morals and beliefs just to look good or win support I imagine. Whether Obama walked away 20 years ago or stayed in the church to this day, the criticism would still exist on how Republicans felt he should have handled the situation In the current situation, I would say that Obama handled the situation tactfully and in good taste, when the subject of Wright first hit mainstream media. Good judgment.

Beyond handling this issue with great judgment, Obama has also exercised great judgment in countless other situations:

  • Analysts and critics reproached the demeanor of Obama, saying he was “too nice” to show he could fight and lead in the election. Now he has been holding a steady lead in the polls for a month or so. Good judgment.
  • He opted not to take public financing for his campaign. Republicans tried to paint him as not a man of his word. Now he has raised record amounts of money and has built a movement on collecting small donations from millions of people who thought it was a great idea. Good judgment.
  • Obama did not choose Hillary Clinton as his running mate. People questioned a Joe Biden pick because it looked like more of the same and because it would alienate blue-collar workers and women who supported Hillary. Republicans were sure Palin would pick up all of those women voters and it would be noticed in the polls. Now, Obama is proving that he can still garner support in places like Pennsylvania, and in traditionally red states, and there has been no clear uprising of Hillary supporters to protest Obama and Biden. Good judgment.
  • Obama was right about his inital assessment of Iraq and why he chose to vote against an unjust war. Good judgment.

The list could start becoming quite extensive, but the point is – how much good judgment does one have to exhibit for the Republicans to stop playing that card. Need I remind their party of the ultimate example of a leader that uses little to no judgment when making decisions for this country? (the answer is Bush, and he is Republican).

Republicans should not even be allowed to criticize the Democratic candidates of 2008 for their judgment or expertise. Bush had 8 years to get something right, and his party blindly followed him in Washington, because they were all from the same club. To me this is bad judgment.

Obama has given me an impression that all of his decisions are forward looking. He does not look to make a decision that will just change the now – he looks at the long term implications so that a decision made today will not weaken this country later.

This ad is a poor attempt to attack a candidate on a subject that the Republican party already realizes it has no credibility on. I know McCain is desperate: he has been throwing all of his kitchen sinks at Obama in these last few days. However, even he knows that the Jeremiah Wright issue never really was an issue at all.


Sphere: Related Content

Popularity: unranked [?]

It Ain't Over Till McCain Says So! Or is it?

Is this race over? There are 3 days left, before November 4th arrives, however it seems that every major poll has Senator Obama up in the polls, and news outlets have even said that McCain has a tough task ahead of him, where the odds are really not in his favor right now. McCain continuing [...]

I do not know about anyone else, but this Presidential Election in 2008 is both very exciting, but also very nerve racking. Like a drug, I feel like it is bad for me to continue watching CNN for 5 or 6 hours each day, yet I cannot break this addiction. So, to add to the [...]

RSS The Young Writer’s Block

© 2008 The Apathy Remedy Affiliated with Young Writers' Block Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha