The situation in Gaza continues to escalate – not only in terms of the the military operations but also in terms of the scrutiny being applied to the tactics of the Israeli Defense Force.

Israeli forces dropped leaflets and made calls urging Palestinians to stay away from Hamas strongholds…I appreciate the sentiment and the effort to inform them before invading the densely populated Gaza Strip, but I do not think that then justifies the 820 Gazans that have died thus far in the fighting, compared to 13 Israelis.
Death is death, and the attacks that have been perpetuated on either side is not deemed more right than another, however, as I have said in earlier posts, I do not believe this was the most productive way to “deal with Hamas“.
This on top of new allegations that Israel is using weapons that are against international standards continue to make this a situation that is not ideal in the Middle East.  
UN Security Council asked for an immediate cease-fire.  Israel says that the rockets currently being fired into its country shows a cease-fire is unworkable.  Hmmm I purport that Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip makes a cease-fire seem unworkable to Hamas.  So maybe someone should show good faith by yielding.  As Israel is on the offensive in the particular conflict, I believe it is their responsibility to respond properly and accordingly.  
It is a shame that now Israel is talking about a third stage to these attacks.  2 weeks and this is still on going.  Israel is not proving me wrong right now, and that is unfortunate.
Sphere: Related Content

Popularity: -1% [?]


The aerial campaign waged by Israel on Gaza claimed a lot of lives.  A lot of civilian lives, which caused a stir in the international community and a firestorm of comments from all angles weighing the validity of Israel’s attacks as well as the timing and probability that it will accomplish Israel’s goals.

So I wonder what Israel is going to do now that Hamas has decided to tactically retreat into the crowded cities of Gaza?  Rather than fight the ground troops of the Israeli’s, it seems a better manuveur for Hamas is to wait in the cities and force Israel to wage their campaign in the densely populated areas risking even more civilian casualties.
I admit, it is a very tactical move.  Do I think it is wrong?  Yes.  Hamas has used civilians and unassuming places to maintain bases for operations and rocket launching sites.  Their use of a district in Gaza for instance to launch rockets, bodes ill for all of the residents in that area, and they suffer the consequences for the actions of Hamas.  However in a struggle in which you have “homefield advantage” it is not a tactically wrong decision to use your land wisely.
And Hamas has the advantage of international sympathy.  For each additional Gazan civilian killed due to Israel’s campaign, the more heavily I believe the international community will lean on Israel to suspend their campaign.  In fact, on the outset of the bombing, rather than pass judgment on whether Israel should or should not be bombing, countries just asked that Israel avoid civilian casualties.
This tactical retreat could do one of two things.  It may place this situation in Gaza in a place where Israel is not willing to go, because it is a very good chance that civilian casualties will increase with a campaign in the city.  This minimizes the attractiveness of continued military action opening up the attractiveness of other solutions.
The other thing that could happen, which I think is more likely, is that Israel will pursue.  It would be in line with their first decision to begin the bombing campaign and continue it despite the outcry that has poured out around the world.  Israel is driven by a mission to deal a crippling blow to Hamas – the only tangible result they will see is one in which there is an obvious Hamas demise.  Allowing Hamas to retreat into the city without pursuit may look like a victory for Hamas, which would be the antithesis to what Israel is trying to accomplish.  I do not believe Israel will pursue Hamas with the intention of harming Gazans, but I think that their mission objectives are seated very highly on the priority ladder and preventing civilian casualties a far second.
If Israel takes it into the cities, what will the international community be willing to do?  Will U.S. and West European countries step up and not side with Israel for once in the history of the world?  Will other countries begin taking necessary steps to hold Israel accountable for rising civilian deaths?  
I hope Israel proves me wrong, and thinks twice about chasing Hamas into the heavily populated cities of Gaza.
Sphere: Related Content

Popularity: unranked [?]

Gaza Strip: A Timeout Is Not a Truce

A three hour lull in the Israeli offensive in Gaza has been accepted as the beginnings of a truce or ceasefire agreement.  In that window, Israeli is “allowing” humanitarian aid to reach the Gazans that are being affected by this situation and in “exchange” Hamas has agreed not to launch rockets at Israeli targets during [...]

The majority Muslim area of Kashmir in India leaves 50 injured after protests against what is occurring in the Gaza Strip. This goes back to the posts I have written on this developing situation.  As the campaign continues against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, and after Israel rejected the French proposal of a 48 [...]

RSS The Young Writer’s Block

© 2008 The Apathy Remedy Affiliated with Young Writers' Block Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha